Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, December 24 through Wednesday, December 26 inclusive. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 19.12.16 in Vol 2, No 1 (2016): December

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Poster

    Prototype Development of a Responsive Emotive Sensing System (DRESS): System Operations Testing Outcomes

    1School of Nursing, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, United States

    2School of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States

    3Gerontechnology R & D, EDDEE Consulting, Charlestown, MA, United States

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Diane Mahoney, ARNP, PhD

    School of Nursing

    MGH Institute of Health Professions

    36 First Avenue

    Charlestown, MA, 02129-4557

    United States

    Phone: 1 617 643 2745

    Fax:1 617 643 6350

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Smart-home consumer technologies have been criticized for failing to disclose their operational performance characteristics to the marketplace. As one result, some users of wearable fitness technologies have reported being frustrated by invalid motivational responses based on fluctuations in accurate performance measurement by certain brands. Gerontechnology researchers have similarly documented the critical importance of valid operations and technical stability as major influences on whether older adults and their caregivers adopt and use new cognitive assistive technologies. We have been iteratively developing the DRESS (Development of a Responsive Emotive Sensing System) system, integrating context aware computing with effective sensor and interactive technologies, to customize coaching persons with dementia to dress independently. Our prior testing focused on components and clothing identification, not the overall system performance. Consequently, we initiated system testing, as part of our alpha version development phase, to assess key metrics and disclose the performance outcomes.

    Objective: To assess the operational accuracy (validity) and stability (reliability) of the DRESS system alpha prototype model.

    Methods: We conducted a 110 day device trial run-in study. The system operated 24/7 in a studio-sized testing unit using the local WiFi network. A 69-year-old tester documented any usability issues during this period. Automatic log reports were generated daily by the system and validated and annotated by the project manager. A content analysis of the user and log reports was conducted, and descriptive statistics were used to describe the operational findings.

    Results: The system functioned error free for the majority of the trial (75% of days) with stable performance for 95.5% of days. Thirty-seven correctable error events occurred during 28 of the 110 days and resulted in 4 categories of errors: Hardware (0.9%), from a defective IPad charger; Network (3.6%), from host network disconnects/power outage; Usability (4.5%), from the visual displays/buttons on the caregivers’ device being too small in size; and Re-initialization (24.5%), from the operating system/Indigo software updates.

    Conclusions: Overall, the system performed very favorably for an alpha prototype. As expected, the initial deployment required an immediate debugging period primarily rectified by software recoding. Notably no fatal or irresolvable errors occurred. The system remained stable except for a disconnect due to a weather-related regional power outage. Lessons learned, such as integrating a remote automatic reboot capability, will be used to further optimize system performance before advancing to an in-home study with persons experiencing dementia.

    iproc 2016;2(1):e12

    doi:10.2196/iproc.6030

    KEYWORDS


    This poster was presented at the Connected Health Symposium 2016, October 20-21, Boston, MA, United States. The poster is displayed as an image in Figure 1 and as a PDF in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Figure 1. Poster.
    View this figure

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Poster.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 412KB

    Edited by T Hale; submitted 26.05.16; peer-reviewed by CHS Scientific Program Committee; comments to author 02.08.16; revised version received 04.08.16; accepted 05.08.16; published 19.12.16

    ©Diane Mahoney, Winslow Burleson, Jeremy Rowe, Edward Mahoney. Originally published in Iproceedings (http://www.iproc.org), 19.12.2016.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in Iproceedings, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.iproc.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.