Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 30.12.16 in Vol 2, No 1 (2016): December

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Poster

    Early Indications Human-Centered Decision Aids Help People Make More Appropriate Care Decisions

    Department of Research and Analytics, Emmi, Chicago, IL, United States

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Geri Lynn Baumblatt, MA

    Department of Research and Analytics

    Emmi

    300 W Adams St, Suite 1200

    Chicago, IL, 60606

    United States

    Phone: 1 312 568 4078

    Fax:1 312 568 4178

    Email: geri@emmisolutions.com


    ABSTRACT

    Background: Conditions like chronic low back, hip, and knee pain and low-risk prostate cancer are frequently over-treated. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports that for chronic low back pain, spinal fusion surgery increased from 61,000 in 1993 to 465,000 in 2011. This has not improved outcomes or reduced disability rates. Patients frequently catastrophize their pain and avoid beneficial activities like walking. Likewise, men with low-risk prostate cancer often react with fear and opt for more invasive treatments like surgery over active surveillance. These are often stressful decisions that patients do not make based solely on data and information but contain strong emotional factors as patients consider the tradeoffs and the short- and long-term effects on their lives and those of their partners and families. A previous randomized controlled trial showed that a multimedia program created with a human-centered approach reduced anxiety. Web-based multimedia decision aids created with patient input through a human-centered approach may better engage patients; address their emotions, concerns, and understanding; and promote calm deliberation.

    Objective: Our objective was to gain insight into whether patients who viewed the chronic low back pain, chronic hip osteoarthritis (OA) pain, chronic knee OA pain, and low-risk prostate cancer multimedia decision aids developed with patient input and a human-centered approach are now more interested in less aggressive (non-surgical) treatment options. We also aimed to gain insight into whether patients who view multimedia decision aids designed with a human-centered approach about conditions such as end stage renal disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and early-stage invasive breast cancer now understand that there is more than one way to treat their condition, if they now have a better understanding the pros and cons of their treatment options, and if they now have a better sense of which treatment(s) make the most sense for them.

    Methods: Web-based multimedia decision aids developed using a human-centered approach were prescribed to patients who needed to make a treatment decision and engage in shared decision making about chronic low back pain, chronic hip or knee pain due to OA, low-risk prostate cancer, and a variety of other conditions where shared decision making is needed. After viewing a multimedia decision aid program, patients could opt to take a standard Web-based survey. An open field was also provided to allow patients to provide additional thoughts or comments. The program was viewed by over 50,000 patients across over 300 US hospitals and providers; 7300 of those patients completed surveys.

    Results: A total of 7300 surveys from July 1, 2012, through November 4, 2015, across 15 decision aids found that 97% now understand there is more than one way to treat their condition, 95% better understand the pros and cons of treatments, and 90% have a better sense of which treatment(s) are right for them. Of those with low back, hip, or knee pain or low-risk prostate cancer, 36%-42% reported a change of mind and now lean away from aggressive treatment (2826 with low back pain [36%], 1176 with hip pain [42%], 1759 with knee pain [38%], and 466 with low-risk prostate cancer [37%]). Patient comments also revealed improved understanding of patient conditions and how serious they may or may not be; many reported less anxiety and felt they would now be able to have better shared decision making conversations with their physicians.

    Conclusions: A significant number of patients (37%-44%) who viewed Web-based multimedia decision aids for chronic low back, hip, or knee pain or low-risk prostate cancer indicated that they are now interested in less aggressive treatment options (such as physical therapy for pain or active surveillance for prostate cancer). Patient comments reinforced that patients felt less anxious about chronic pain or low-risk prostate cancer and understood they had time to make a decision and did not have to rush into more aggressive or invasive treatments like surgery. Most patients who viewed Web-based multimedia decision aids created with a patient-informed, human-centered approach about the conditions mentioned above as well as conditions such as early-stage invasive breast cancer, end-stage renal disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and uterine fibroids reported now understanding they have more than one treatment option, the pros and cons of those options, and which option makes the most sense for them. Human-centered decision aids that address patient concerns, experiences, and emotions can help people make more appropriate care decisions.

    iproc 2016;2(1):e2

    doi:10.2196/iproc.6223

    KEYWORDS


    This poster was presented at the Connected Health Symposium 2016, October 20-21, Boston, MA, United States. The poster is displayed as an image in Figure 1 and as a PDF in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Figure 1. Poster.
    View this figure

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Poster.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 2MB

    Edited by T Hale; submitted 17.06.16; peer-reviewed by CHS Scientific Program Committee; accepted 02.08.16; published 30.12.16

    ©Geri Lynn Baumblatt, Jason Gottlieb, Mark Mulert. Originally published in Iproceedings (http://www.iproc.org), 30.12.2016.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in Iproceedings, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.iproc.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.