Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (2015): October

Design of A Smartphone Application for Automated Wound Measurements for Home Care

Design of A Smartphone Application for Automated Wound Measurements for Home Care

Design of A Smartphone Application for Automated Wound Measurements for Home Care

Abstract

1Department of BIomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

2Tissue Analytics, Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States

3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Boston, MA, United States

Corresponding Author:

Gabriel A Brat, MD, MPH

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care

75 Francis Street

Boston, MA, 02115

United States

Phone: 1 617 732 8042

Fax:1 617 5669549

Email: gbrat@partners.org


Background: There are 8.5 million Americans who suffer from a chronic wound. Due to the lack of an objective system to measure and characterize wounds, the current standard of care relies highly on provider guesswork. This leads to misinformed care decisions, ultimately leading to prolonged healing times and high healthcare expenditures.

Objective: This study describes the design and validation of a smartphone image-based system for accurately measuring and characterizing chronic wounds in an automated and objective fashion.

Methods: Photos (n=81) were collected by the study team from patients (n=25) at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Wound Clinic in an IRB-approved study. Photos were taken using a variety of smartphones such that our training data set would include nuances of different smartphone cameras. We combined supervised image classification and computer vision to detect wound edges and segment the tissues within the wound. 15 individuals (“raters”) with various levels of training were then instructed to trace wound regions in a diverse subset of the wound images arbitrarily selected by the study team (n=10). The ensemble wound edge and tissue segmentation algorithms were compared against an 80% inter-rater gold standard.

Results: The automated method resulted in a sensitivity = 98.31 ± 2.18 and specificity = 92.06 ± 7.86). In contrast, the ruler-based measurement resulted in sensitivity = 1 ± 0, Specificity = 0.57 ± 0.30. A normalized area measurement for the automated method resulted in a normalized area of 1.14 ± 0.17. In comparison, the standard of care method resulted in a normalized area of 1.86 ± 0.30 relative to gold standard. With respect to tissue segmentation, the overall average tissue classification accuracy on k-fold cross validation using the sparse neural network method is 93.6% ± 3.3%.

Conclusions: The result illustrates the large overestimation of wound size that occurred when the wounds were measured using the ruler measurement. It also corroborates the literature-reported value of measurement inaccuracy by standard methods. Our study shows the feasibility of an easily deployed smartphone system to classify wounds in an automated manner with high accuracy. Such a system could be used to objectify measurements by nurses in the home care environment, thus improving the accuracy of wound care and, potentially, the outcomes of patients.

iProc 2015;1(1):e16

doi:10.2196/iproc.4703

Keywords


(This is a conference paper presented at the Connected Health Symposium, Boston, 2015, which was not edited and is only lightly peer-reviewed).

Multimedia Appendix 1

Extended abstract.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 593KB

References

    Edited by G Eysenbach, T Hale; submitted 16.05.15; peer-reviewed by M Kandola, E Chung; comments to author 23.07.15; accepted 23.07.15; published 27.10.15

    Copyright

    ©Joshua Budman, Kevin Keenahan, Soumyadipta Acharya, Gabriel A. Brat. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://www.iproc.org), 27.10.2015.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.